- #Ascension catholic church youtube full#
- #Ascension catholic church youtube trial#
- #Ascension catholic church youtube series#
For example, the churches in Galilee and Samaria are barely mentioned (Acts 9:31), and the establishing of a strong church in Egypt during this time isn’t mentioned at all.
#Ascension catholic church youtube full#
We must remember that Acts does not give us a full history of the church during this period. Luke’s Gospel describes only the beginning of Jesus’ work Acts describes its continuation and the work of Jesus continues to our present day. Of all that Jesus began both to do and teach: Notice that the former account concerned all that Jesus began both to do and teach. That Christianity is lawful (as the true fulfillment of Judaism, which was an approved religion in the Roman Empire).Ĭ.That Christianity is innocent (Roman judges could find no basis for prosecution).That Christianity is harmless (some Romans officials had embraced it themselves).Luke wanted to show Theophilus and the Romans: This physical limitation has determined the length of many books of the Bible.” (Boice) Luke used two scrolls to tell his story, and one we call “The Gospel of Luke” and the other we call “The Book of Acts.” When it got any longer it got too bulky to carry around. It was practical to have a scroll about thirty-five feet in length. “Ancient books were generally written on papyrus scrolls. In those two years, Luke had plenty of time to research and write his Gospel and the Book of Acts. Luke arrived in Jerusalem with Paul in Acts 21:17 he left with him again on the journey to Rome in Acts 27:1.
#Ascension catholic church youtube trial#
Since Acts ends with Paul awaiting trial before Caesar, some have wondered if Luke-Acts are not “defense briefs” on Paul’s behalf to give a Roman official background on Paul’s case. In the introduction to the first volume (Luke 1:3), Luke addresses Theophilus with title most excellent, which was a way to address people who held high office. Or, the name could be symbolic, because the name Theophilus means “God-lover.” He might have been a Roman official being briefed by Luke about the history of the Christian movement. Theophilus: This man might have been a Christian wanting instruction. Martyn Lloyd-Jones called Acts “that most lyrical of books…Live in that book, I exhort you: It is a tonic, the greatest tonic I know of in the realm of the Spirit.” (Cited in Stott)ī.
John Calvin wrote that the Book of Acts was “a kind of vast treasure.” D. Roman historians have long taken it for granted.”
#Ascension catholic church youtube series#
In terms of time and place the details are precise and correct… As documents these narratives belong to the same historical series as the record of provincial and imperial trials in epigraphical and literary sources of the first and early second centuries AD…For Acts the confirmation of historicity is overwhelming…Any attempt to reject its basic historicity even in matters of detail must now appear absurd.
Sherwin-White, an expert in Graeco-Roman history from Oxford, wrote about Acts: “The historical framework is exact. It is definitely the work of contemporary eyewitnesses. But William Ramsay, a noted archaeologist and Bible scholar, proved that the historical record of Acts is remarkably accurate regarding the specific practices, laws and customs of the period it claims to record. There was a time when many scholars and critics thought that Acts was sort of a romance novel of the early church, written more than 100 years after the events supposedly happened. We know that he was a devoted companion of Paul (from the text of Acts, and Colossians 4:14, Philemon 24, and 2 Timothy 4:11).We know that he was a Gentile (from his name).We know that he was a physician (Colossians 4:14).We really don’t know all that much about Luke from the New Testament.
Probably he regarded himself as recording sacred history.” (Marshall) “Since Luke can write in a different style (Lk. Acts is written in the literary style of the Greek translation of the Old Testament, known as the Septuagint.
It was the subject to the most intense hatreds and persecutions.” (Boice) It taught truths that were incredible to the unregenerate world. It had no money, no proven leaders, no technological tools for propagating the gospel. “Humanly speaking, had nothing going for it. That expansion from Jerusalem to Rome is a remarkable story. “A great New Testament scholar has said that the title of Acts might be, ‘How they brought the Good News from Jerusalem to Rome.’” (Barclay) Who was Paul? How did the gospel get from Jerusalem to Rome? The Book of Acts answers these questions. You pick up your Bible and see the ministry of Jesus ending in the Gospel of John next you read about a man named Paul writing to the followers of Jesus in Rome. Imagine what it would be like if the Book of Acts wasn’t in the Bible. At one time the Gospel of Luke and the Book of Acts were joined together as one book with two volumes. The former account I made: The former account is the Gospel of Luke. The former account I made, O Theophilus, of all that Jesus began both to do and teach.Ī.
0 kommentar(er)
